{"id":96,"date":"2008-03-02T17:02:48","date_gmt":"2008-03-02T21:02:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cefocusing.com\/wordpress\/?p=96"},"modified":"2010-02-12T16:32:59","modified_gmt":"2010-02-12T20:32:59","slug":"interpersonal-focusing-rosenbergs-non-violent-communication","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cefocusing.com\/wordpress\/interpersonal-focusing-rosenbergs-non-violent-communication\/","title":{"rendered":"INTERPERSONAL FOCUSING: ROSENBERG’S NONVIOLENT COMMUNICATION"},"content":{"rendered":"

Download complete instructions on using Intuitive Focusing and Focused Listening Turns to resolve\u00a0 interpersonal conflicts, turning conflict into creativity: Chapter Five: Interpersonal Focusing<\/span><\/a>\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong>Capitulo Cinco El Proceso Interpersonal<\/span><\/a>\u00a0 Order the complete Self-Help Package<\/span><\/a>\u00a0.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>\u00a0(Read introductory philosophy \u201cThis flower is beautiful TO ME\u201d<\/span><\/a>\u00a0)<\/strong><\/p>\n

USING NONVIOLENT COMMUNICATION (NVC) FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION<\/strong><\/p>\n

My comments below are based upon my introduction to Rosenberg’s work 30 years\u00a0ago. I stick with them because his early rubric made the difference between actual observed behavior, a person’s interpretation of that behavior, and, BECAUSE OF THIS PERSONAL INTERPRETATION, a person’s emotional reaction to a behavior, so very clear. <\/strong><\/p>\n

However, you can catch up on Rosenberg’s many advances, new books, refinements of theory, and find workshops and teachers, all at www.cnvc.org<\/a>\u00a0. In particular, there has been great amplification of the Needs\/Wants part of the rubric, and many teachers have explicitly incorporated Gendlin’s Focusing into their teaching of NVC
\n<\/strong>\u00a0
\nMarshall Rosenberg’s Basic Rubric:
\n<\/strong>\u00a0
\n“When you did (observable behavior), I thought (my interpretation), and THEREFORE I felt (my internal feeling state). I want (a specific action as a step in resolving the situation).”
\n\u00a0
\nIn Interpersonal Focusing: This Flower is Beautiful TO ME Week One<\/a>, I contrasted domination through “objective” statement of the “facts” or “blaming” through locating causation in the Other with empowering communication through “owning” and sharing one’s own more vulnerable subjective experiencing of situations.
\n\u00a0
\nIn Interpersonal Felt Sensing: Exercise<\/a>, I invited you to look for the “intuitive feel,” the experience in your own body, of being in up to five different “unresolved” interpersonal situations.
\n\u00a0
\nToday, I ask you to take these same five experiences and try formulating them in the Nonviolent Communication (NVC) <\/a>paradigm of Marshall Rosenberg.
\n\u00a0
\nMarshall Rosenberg has been teaching his model for Nonviolent Communication since at least the 1970’s, when many of us involved in the original Changes Listening\/Focusing Community also studied with him. He has refined his model over the years and published numerous books for applying NVC to relationships, parenting, and conflict resolution in organizations and the global community. But I am going to lay out his paradigm in the simple terms which have stuck with me for over thirty years.
\n\u00a0
\nA. Observable Behavior
\n<\/strong>\u00a0
\nThe observable behavior of the other which led you to have an interpersonal “reaction.” This must be as specific, concrete, non-interpreted, and observable as you can make it. E.g., anyone could see the same behavior, although “interpretation” of it might vary:
\n\u00a0
\n“When you clinched up your teeth and shook your fist…”
\n“When you arrived one hour after our appointed time…”
\n“When you sat down next to Jane…”
\n“When you handed in your report two days early…”
\nWhen you borrowed $100 dollars from me and had not repaid it by Jan.1…”<\/p>\n

B. Your Interpretation<\/strong>
\n\u00a0
\nYour interpretation of the observable behavior: What you thought:
\n\u00a0
\n“…I thought you were angry at me…”
\n“…I thought you didn’t care about me, didn’t respect my time…”
\n“…I thought you liked her more than me…”
\n“…I thought you were trying to earn brownie points…”
\n“…I thought you were never going to pay it back…”<\/p>\n

C. Your Feeling “Reaction” To Your Interpretation<\/strong><\/p>\n

The feeling or “felt sense” that came inside of your body because of\u00a0 this interpretation:
\n“…and THEREFORE I felt afraid…”
\n“…and THEREFORE I felt angry…”
\n“…and THEREFORE I felt jealous and insecure…”
\n“…and THEREFORE I felt fearful and like fighting back…”
\n“…and THEREFORE I felt insecure and angry…”
\n(see List of feeling words on NVC website<\/a> for help)<\/p>\n

D. Your Want or Need in This Situation<\/strong><\/p>\n

A specific action step you “want” to resolve the situation:
\n“I would like you to tell me if I did something specific to anger you.”
\n“I would like you to tell me how you do feel about me and what caused you to be late.”
\n“I want you to clarify how you feel about Jane and how you feel about me.”
\n“I want you to tell me your own thinking about handing the report in early.”
\n“I want you to tell me when and if you are planning to pay the money back.”
\n(see List of Wants\/Needs on NVC website<\/a> for help — actually, this step is more complicated, a deeper acknowledgment of your Core Beliefs and related Needs\/Wants)<\/p>\n

“Thinking” Masquerading as “Feeling”<\/strong><\/p>\n

I ask you to take your own specific unresolved interpersonal situations from last week’s Interpersonal Felt Sensing Exercise and try to formulate a sentence for each using Rosenberg’s rubric —
\n\u00a0
\n“When you (observable behavior)…I thought (interpretation)…and THEREFORE I felt (internal feeling state)…I want (specific action).”
\n\u00a0
\nPlease notice especially how often “thinking,” (“interpretation,” “blaming the other”) masquerades as “feeling” (an actual internal emotional experience, like sadness, anger, joy, elation, nervousness, fear, greed):
\n\u00a0
\n“I feel like you don’t care about me” = “I think you don’t care about me, and therefore I feel…”
\n\u00a0
\n“I feel like you are angry with me” = “I observe your clinched teeth, shaking fist, and I think you are angry with me, so I feel frightened…”
\n\u00a0
\n“I feel oppressed” = “I think I am being oppressed by you, and I feel small, paralyzed, angry…”
\n\u00a0
\n“I feel manipulated” = “I think you are manipulating me, and I feel anxious, powerless, angry…”
\n\u00a0
\nNext week I will tell why I prefer an Interpersonal Listening\/Focusing exchange to pure use of Nonviolent Communication for problem resolution.
\n\u00a0
\nAnd, I am not an expert in NVC, especially the latest refinements (you might see Leona’s blogs on NVC<\/a> for a more thorough version of the exercise above , including the relationship between Thinking Interpretations, Core Beliefs, and unmet Needs\/Wants, and many other applications of NVC exercises to real life situations). But you will learn a lot if you just try the simple rubric —
\n\u00a0
\n“When you (specific behavior), I thought (interpretation)…and THEREFORE I felt…I want…”<\/strong><\/p>\n

What were the specific behaviors I observed which I then interpreted?
\nWhat might be some alternate interpretations for those behaviors?
\nWhat do I learn about myself from my interpretations?
\nCan I see how I might use “blaming” interpretations of the other’s behavior as a mask over “owning” and sharing my more vulnerable feelings and needs?
\nHow do my Core Beliefs about myself and my Wants\/Needs color my interpersonal “reactions” and “interpretations”?<\/p>\n

See top of this blog for links to download complete manual Chapter on Interpersonal Focusing in English or Spanish.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Find links to free articles, personality tests, multi-media\u00a0Self-Help training, Classes and workshops<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Dr. Kathy McGuire<\/span><\/a>, Director<\/p>\n

Creative Edge Focusing (TM)<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

www.cefocusing.com<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

The site of new insights and creative solutions is at the edge of what is already known. This edge, The Creative Edge, holds implicit within it all past and future knowing about the problem, more than could ever be put into words in a linear way<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Marshall Rosenberg’s Nonviolent Communication provides a way for us to acknowledge that it is our own interpretation of another’s behavior which leads to our personal emotional response, not the objective behavior itself. “Owning” one’s own emotional response is a first step in non-defensive communication to another in a conflict situation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,112],"tags":[741,160,221,224,96,222,225,226,223],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cefocusing.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cefocusing.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cefocusing.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cefocusing.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cefocusing.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=96"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.cefocusing.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":571,"href":"https:\/\/www.cefocusing.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96\/revisions\/571"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cefocusing.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=96"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cefocusing.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=96"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cefocusing.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=96"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}